CRITICAL THINKING: CONSIDER THE VERDICT, 6/E

Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict, 6/E
-
Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict focuses on systematic skills rather than isolated techniques. Students are forced to make rulings concerning an argument. (e.g.: Is this argument relevant? Is the burden of proof appropriately placed?) Students weigh competing arguments to determine which is the strongest, and construct their own arguments by analogy using cited judicial precedents. Additionally, they find new topics less intimidating; e.g.: the material may be new, but it is in a setting with familiar landmarks. (ex. p. 49)
-
MyThinkingLab is an online resource that contains book-specific practice tests, chapter summaries, learning objectives, flashcards, weblinks, MySearchLab, a complete E-book and media-rich activities that enhance topics covered in Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict 6/e.
-
The Pearson eText lets students access their textbook anytime, anywhere, and any way they want–including listening online or downloading to iPad.
-
A personalized study plan for each student promotes better critical-thinking skills, and helps students succeed in the course and beyond.
-
Assessment tied to every video, application, and chapter enables both instructors and students to track progress and get immediate feedback. With results feeding into a powerful gradebook, the assessment program helps instructors identify student challenges early–and find the best resources with which to help students.
-
Class Prep collects the very best class presentation resources in one convenient online destination, so instructors can keep students engaged throughout every class.
-
“Argue Your Case” segments give students practice in developing cogent and compelling arguments for a specific position, and helps them develop an appreciation of the importance of good arguments and a sense of the positive benefits of critical thinking in addition to simple protection against being fooled by fallacies. (ex. p. 254)
-
“Consider the Verdict” boxes-integrated into the text and exercises-give students opportunities to evaluate, compare, and critique arguments and competing arguments. (ex. p. 80)
-
Student interest is maintained when real-life examples and cases are drawn from court trials, judicial reviews, advertising, political campaigns, and controversial social issues. (ex. p. 79)
-
An optional chapter on “Thinking Critically about Statistics”—Chapter 17—examines the use and misuse of surveys, averages, and statistical comparisons.
-
Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict’s readable, conversational style with substance avoids a heavy “textbook” feel and tone. It allows students to easily read and understand the text on their own.
-
A wealth of exercises—including chapter-end and longer comprehensive review exercises drawn from real-life cases involving trials, judicial reviews, advertising, political campaigns, and arguments over controversial social issues—maintain student interest by reflecting real-life situations. (ex. p. 113)
-
Suggested Website resources are available for many chapters. They encourage students’ study and exploration of further materials. (ex. p. 114)
-
A glossary provides students with a handy source of reference and easy access to all the terms and definitions used throughout the text.
-
Instructors find it easy to teach from Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict because students are given an argument context that orients them to new material and helps them place it in a familiar setting — giving you the freedom to present different, complimentary material in class!
-
Instructor’s Manual with Tests (0205158757): For each chapter in the text, this resource provides a detailed outline and test questions in true/ false, fill-in-the-blank, and short answer formats. For easy access, this manual is available within the instructor section of MyThinkingLab for Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict, 6/e,or at www.pearsonhighered.com/irc.
-
MyTest (0205158781): This computerized software will allow you to create your own personalized exams, edit any or all of the existing test questions, and add new questions. Other special features of the program include random generation of test questions, creation of alternate versions of the same test, scrambling question sequence, and test preview before printing. For easy access, this software is available atwww.pearsonhighered.com/irc.
-
PowerPoint Presentation Slides for Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict 6/e (0205158773): These PowerPoint slides help you convey critical thinking principles in a clear and engaging way. For easy access, they are available within the instructor section of MyThinkingLab for Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict 6/e,or at www.pearsonhighered.com/irc.
2.) COMPREHENSIVE
Preface
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 3 Ad Hominem Arguments
Chapter 4 The Second Deadly Fallacy: The Strawman Fallacy
Chapter 5 What’s the Question?
Chapter 7 Analyzing Arguments
Chapter 8 The Burden of Proof
Chapter 10 Appeal to Authority
Cumulative Exercises One
(Chapters 1 through 10)
Cumulative Exercises Two
(Chapters 1 through 13)
Chapter 15 Scientific and Causal Reasoning
Chapters 1 through 16)
Chapter 18 Symbolic Sentential Logic
Chapter 19 Arguments about Classes
Key Terms
Answers to Selected Exercises
Index
Preface
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1 Introduction
Critical Thinking in Everyday Life
Play Fair
Jury Research: Eliminating or Selecting Bias?
Impartial Critical Thinking
Additional Reading
Online Resources
Arguments
Statements
Premises and Conclusions
Deductive and Inductive Arguments
Deduction, Validity, and Soundness
Induction, Strong Arguments, and Cogent Arguments
The Ad Hominem Fallacy
Nonfallacious Ad Hominem Arguments
Ad Hominem and Testimony
Distinguishing Argument from Testimony
Tricky Types of Ad Hominem
Bias Ad Hominem
Inconsistency and Ad Hominem
Psychological Ad Hominem
Inverse Ad Hominem
Attacking Arguments
Exercises 3-2
Strawman
The Principle of Charity
The Strawman Fallacy
Special Strawman Varieties
Determine the Conclusion
What Is the Exact Conclusion?
Premises Are Relevant or Irrelevant Relative to the Conclusion
Irrelevant Reason Fallacy
The Red Herring Fallacy
Argument Structure
Convergent Arguments
Linked Arguments
Exercises 7-1, 7-2 and 7-3
Assumptions: Their Use and Abuse
Legitimate Assumptions
Enthymemes
Illegitimate Assumptions
Who Bears the Burden of Proof?
Appeal to Ignorance
The Burden of Proof in the Courtroom
Presumption of Innocence
When the Defendant Does Not Testify
Juries and the Burden of Proof
Unappealing Ignorance
Defintions
Stipulative Definitions
Controversial Definitions
Authorities as Testifiers
Conditions for Legitimate Appeal to Authority
Popularity and Tradition
Exercise 10-1
Cumulative Exercises One
(Chapters 1 through 10)
Figurative Analogy
Deductive Argument by Analogy
The Fallacy of Faulty Analogy
Analyzing a Deductive Argument by Analogy
The Fallacy of Analogical Literalism
Caution! Watch for Analogies That Look Like Slippery Slopes!
Inductive Arguments by Analogy
Slippery Slope
Separating Slippery Slopes from Strawmen
Genuine Slippery Slopes
Exercises 12-1and 12-2
Genuine Dilemmas
False Dilemmas
False Dilemma Combined with Strawman
Consider the Possibilities
Golden Mean
The Golden Mean Fallacy
Constructing Golden Mean Fallacies
Exercise 12-4
The Problem with Question-Begging Arguments
Subtle Forms of Question Begging
Synonymous Begging the Question
Generalization Begging the Question
Circular Begging the Question
Self-Sealing Arguments
Complex Questions
Cumulative Exercises Two
(Chapters 1 through 13)
Necessary Conditions
Distinguishing Necessary from Sufficient Conditions
Sufficient Conditions
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Ordinary Language
Conditional Statements
Alternative Ways of Stating Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Both Necessary and Sufficient
Valid Inferences from Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
Modus Ponens
Modus Tollens
Fallacies Based on Confusion between Necessary and Sufficient Conditions
The Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent
The Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent
Detecting Argument Forms
Exercises 14-6, 14-7, and 14-8
Distinguishing Causation from Correlation
The Questionable Cause Fallacy
The Method of Science
Randomized Studies and Prospective Studies
Making Predictions
When Predictions Go Wrong
Faulty “Scientific” Claims
Eyewitness Testimony
Potential Sources of Eyewitness Error
Judging the Honesty of a Witness
The Whole Truth
Are the Premises True?
Digging for Truth
Consider the Source
Chapters 1 through 16)
All Children Are Above Average
Empty Statistics
Finding the Appropriate Context
Caught Off Base
Statistical Apples and Oranges
Statistical Half-Truths
Sample Size and “Statistical Significance”
Truth-Functional Definitions
Negation
Disjunction
Conjunction
Conditional
Material Implication
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
Punctuation
The Truth-Table Method of Testing for Validity
The Short-Cut Method for Determining Validity or Invalidity
Types of Categorical Propositions
Relations among Categorical Propositions
Venn Diagrams
Diagramming Statements
Diagramming Arguments
Translating Ordinary-Language Statements into Standard-Form Categorical Propositions
Reducing the Number of Terms
Comprehensive Critical Thinking in the Jury Room
Case One: Commonwealth v. Moyer
Judge Carroll’s Summation and Charge to the Jury
Case Two: State v. Ransom
Judge Schwebel’s Summation and Charge to the Jury
Key Terms
Answers to Selected Exercises
Index
ISBN-10: 0205158668
ISBN-13: 9780205158669
Publisher: Pearson
Copyright: 2012
Format: Paper; 480 pp
Published: 07/11/2011


